All hell broke loose in the AI world after The Washington Post reported last week that a Google engineer thought that LaMDA, one of the company’s large language models (LLM), was sentient.
The news was followed by a frenzy of articles, videos and social media debates over whether current AI systems understand the world as we do, whether AI systems can be conscious, what are the requirements for consciousness, etc.
We are currently in a state where our large language models have become good enough to convince many people — including engineers — that they are on par with natural intelligence. At the same time, they are still bad enough to make dumb mistakes, as these experiments by computer scientist Ernest Davis show.
What makes this concerning is that research and development on LLMs is mostly controlled by large tech companies that are looking to commercialize their technology by integrating it into applications used by hundreds of millions of users. And it is important that these applications remain safe and robust to avoid confusing or harming their users.
Le règlement DORA : un tournant majeur pour la cybersécurité des institutions financières Le 17…
L’Agence nationale de la sécurité des systèmes d'information (ANSSI) a publié un rapport sur les…
Directive NIS 2 : Comprendre les nouvelles obligations en cybersécurité pour les entreprises européennes La…
Alors que la directive européenne NIS 2 s’apprête à transformer en profondeur la gouvernance de…
L'intelligence artificielle (IA) révolutionne le paysage de la cybersécurité, mais pas toujours dans le bon…
Des chercheurs en cybersécurité ont détecté une intensification des activités du groupe APT36, affilié au…
This website uses cookies.