AI can make better clinical decisions than humans

AI can make better clinical decisions than humans

It’s an old adage: there’s no harm in getting a second opinion. But what if that second opinion could be generated by a computer, using artificial intelligence? Would it come up with better treatment recommendations than your professional proposes?

A pair of Canadian mental-health researchers believe it can. In a study published in the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, Marc Lanovaz of Université de Montréal and Kieva Hranchuk of St. Lawrence College, in Ontario, make a case for using AI in treating behavioral problems.

« Medical and educational professionals frequently disagree on the effectiveness of behavioral interventions, which may cause people to receive inadequate treatment, » said Lanovaz, an associate professor who heads the Applied Behavioral Research Lab at UdeM’s School of Psychoeducation.

To find a better way, Lanovaz and Hranchuk, a professor of behavioral science and behavioral psychology at St. Lawrence, compiled simulated data from 1,024 individuals receiving treatment for behavioral issues.

The researchers then compared the treatment conclusions drawn in each case by five doctoral-level behavior analysts with those produced by a computer model the two academics developed using machine learning.

« The five professionals only came to the same conclusions approximately 75 percent of the time, » said Lanovaz. « More importantly, machine learning produced fewer decision-making errors than did all the professionals. »

Given these very positive results, the next step would be to « integrate our models in an app that could automatically make decisions or provide feedback about how treatment is progressing, » he added.

The goal, the researchers believe, should be to use  to facilitate the work of professionals, not actually replace them, while also making treatment decisions more consistent and predictable.

« For example, doctors could someday use the technology to help them decide whether to continue or terminate the treatment of people with disorders as varied as autism, ADHD, anxiety and depression, » Lanovaz said.

« Individualized clinical and educational decision-making is one of the cornerstones of psychological and behavioral treatment. Our study may thus lead to better treatment options for the millions of individuals who receive these types of services worldwide. »

Source : 

Veille-cyber

Share
Published by
Veille-cyber

Recent Posts

Les 7 menaces cyber les plus fréquentes en entreprise

Introduction La cybersécurité est devenue une priorité stratégique pour toutes les entreprises, grandes ou petites.…

4 jours ago

Cybersécurité : Vers une montée en compétence des établissements de santé grâce aux exercices de crise

Cybersécurité : les établissements de santé renforcent leur défense grâce aux exercices de crise Face…

2 semaines ago

Règlement DORA : implications contractuelles pour les entités financières et les prestataires informatiques

La transformation numérique du secteur financier n'a pas que du bon : elle augmente aussi…

2 semaines ago

L’IA : opportunité ou menace ? Les DSI de la finance s’interrogent

L'IA : opportunité ou menace ? Les DSI de la finance s'interrogent Alors que l'intelligence…

2 semaines ago

Telegram menace de quitter la France : le chiffrement de bout en bout en ligne de mire

Telegram envisage de quitter la France : le chiffrement de bout en bout au cœur…

2 semaines ago

Sécurité des identités : un pilier essentiel pour la conformité au règlement DORA dans le secteur financier

Sécurité des identités : un pilier essentiel pour la conformité au règlement DORA dans le…

2 semaines ago

This website uses cookies.