Ex-Google exec describes 4 top dangers of artificial intelligence

Ex-Google exec describes 4 top dangers of artificial intelligence

California’s Senate last week advanced a bill that would force Amazon (AMZN) to reveal details behind the productivity-tracking algorithm used in its warehouses; meanwhile, Facebook (FB) this week faced criticism over a Wall Street Journal report finding it knows its Instagram feed makes some teenage girls feel worse about themselves.

These developments make up a backlash not necessarily against big tech, so much as its algorithms, which use artificial intelligence (AI) to adapt performance for individual users or employees.

In a new interview, AI expert Kai-Fu Lee — who worked as an executive at Google (GOOGGOOGL), Apple (AAPL), and Microsoft (MSFT) — explained the top four dangers of burgeoning AI technology: externalities, personal data risks, inability to explain consequential choices, and warfare.

« The single largest danger is autonomous weapons, » he says.

« That’s when AI can be trained to kill, and more specifically trained to assassinate, » adds Lee, the co-author of a new book entitled « AI 2041: Ten Visions for Our Future. » « Imagine a drone that can fly itself and seek specific people out either with facial recognition or cell signals or whatever. »

‘It changes the future of warfare’

A ban on autonomous weapons has drawn support from 30 countries, though an in-depth report commissioned by Congress advised the U.S. to oppose a ban, since it could prevent the country from using weapons already in its possession.

In 2015, prominent figures in tech like Tesla CEO Elon Musk and Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak, as well as thousands of AI researchers, signed an open letter calling for a ban on such weapons.

Autonomous weapons will transform warfare since their affordability and precision will make it easier to wreak havoc and near-impossible to identify who committed the crime, Lee said.

« I think that changes the future of terrorism, because no longer are terrorists potentially losing their lives to do something bad, » he says. « It also allows a terrorist group to use 10,000 of these drones to perform something as terrible as genocide, » he says.

Veille-cyber

Share
Published by
Veille-cyber

Recent Posts

Le règlement DORA : un tournant majeur pour la cybersécurité des institutions financières

Le règlement DORA : un tournant majeur pour la cybersécurité des institutions financières Le 17…

5 heures ago

Cybersécurité des transports urbains : 123 incidents traités par l’ANSSI en cinq ans

L’Agence nationale de la sécurité des systèmes d'information (ANSSI) a publié un rapport sur les…

5 heures ago

Directive NIS 2 : Comprendre les obligations en cybersécurité pour les entreprises européennes

Directive NIS 2 : Comprendre les nouvelles obligations en cybersécurité pour les entreprises européennes La…

2 jours ago

NIS 2 : entre retard politique et pression cybersécuritaire, les entreprises dans le flou

Alors que la directive européenne NIS 2 s’apprête à transformer en profondeur la gouvernance de…

3 jours ago

Quand l’IA devient l’alliée des hackers : le phishing entre dans une nouvelle ère

L'intelligence artificielle (IA) révolutionne le paysage de la cybersécurité, mais pas toujours dans le bon…

4 jours ago

APT36 frappe l’Inde : des cyberattaques furtives infiltrent chemins de fer et énergie

Des chercheurs en cybersécurité ont détecté une intensification des activités du groupe APT36, affilié au…

4 jours ago

This website uses cookies.