AI University
As the beginning of the academic year approaches, there is rising alarm among universities about the implications of AI. The focus of this concern is ChatGPT, a program that can, in response to a simple prompt, immediately originate a reasonably convincing approximation of a university-level essay.
Universities are on the defensive, pledging to increase the prevalence of supervised exams, while augmenting their plagiarism detection systems to identify students who have recruited an AI assistant. We’re told innovation (that empty buzzword) will be required, and some have suggested that students could be expected to incorporate the use of AI into their work, becoming for prose what calculators are to maths.
Just as the internet changed the depth and complexity we expect of students’ writing and research, the increasing availability and sophistication of AI might similarly shift the goalposts. Yet the bulk of institutional energy is being directed towards preserving the system as it exists.
As an academic who has marked thousands of assessments in disciplines across the humanities, I can confidently tell you that the system is not worth preserving. Rather than an obstacle to overcome, the flourishing of AI should be seen as an opportunity to ask what universities and assessments are for in the first place.
VPN : un outil indispensable pour protéger vos données Le VPN, ou « Virtual Private…
Cybersécurité et PME : les risques à ne pas sous-estimer On pense souvent que seules…
Comment reconnaître une attaque de phishing et s’en protéger Le phishing ou « hameçonnage »…
Qu’est-ce que la cybersécurité ? Définition, enjeux et bonnes pratiques en 2025 La cybersécurité est…
Cybersécurité : les établissements de santé renforcent leur défense grâce aux exercices de crise Face…
L'IA : opportunité ou menace ? Les DSI de la finance s'interrogent Alors que l'intelligence…
This website uses cookies.