Pentagon believes its precognitive AI can predict events ‘days in advance’

The US military’s AI experiments are growing particularly ambitious. The Drive reports that US Northern Command recently completed a string of tests for Global Information Dominance Experiments (GIDE), a combination of AI, cloud computing and sensors that could give the Pentagon the ability to predict events « days in advance, » according to Command leader General Glen VanHerck. It’s not as mystical as it sounds, but it could lead to a major change in military and government operations.

The machine learning-based system observes changes in raw, real-time data that hint at possible trouble. If satellite imagery shows signs that a rival nation’s submarine is preparing to leave port, for instance, the AI could flag that mobilization knowing the vessel will likely leave soon. Military analysts can take hours or even days to comb through this information — GIDE technology could send an alert within « seconds, » VanHerck said.

The most recent dry run, GIDE 3, was the most expansive yet. It saw all 11 US commands and the broader Defense Department use a mix of military and civilian sensors to address scenarios where « contested logistics » (such as communications in the Panama Canal) might pose a problem. The technology involved wasn’t strictly new, the General said, but the military « stitched everything together. »

The platform could be put into real-world use relatively soon. VanHerck believed the military was « ready to field » the software, and could validate it at the next Globally Integrated Exercise in spring 2022.

The advantages of this predictive AI are fairly clear. Instead of merely reacting to events or relying on outdated info, the Pentagon could take proactive steps like deploying forces or ramping up defenses. It could also provide an « opportunity » for the civilian government, VanHerck added. He didn’t provide examples, but this could help politicians call out acts of aggression while they’re still in the early stages.

There are still limitations. The AI is looking for out-of-the-ordinary clues, such as a greater number of parked cars or aircraft. It can’t say for certain what’s happening — humans will still be heavily involved. Even so, the tech could be worthwhile if it prevents a ‘surprise’ attack or leads to negotiations instead of conflict.

Veille-cyber

Share
Published by
Veille-cyber

Recent Posts

Directive NIS 2 : Comprendre les obligations en cybersécurité pour les entreprises européennes

Directive NIS 2 : Comprendre les nouvelles obligations en cybersécurité pour les entreprises européennes La…

2 jours ago

NIS 2 : entre retard politique et pression cybersécuritaire, les entreprises dans le flou

Alors que la directive européenne NIS 2 s’apprête à transformer en profondeur la gouvernance de…

3 jours ago

Quand l’IA devient l’alliée des hackers : le phishing entre dans une nouvelle ère

L'intelligence artificielle (IA) révolutionne le paysage de la cybersécurité, mais pas toujours dans le bon…

4 jours ago

APT36 frappe l’Inde : des cyberattaques furtives infiltrent chemins de fer et énergie

Des chercheurs en cybersécurité ont détecté une intensification des activités du groupe APT36, affilié au…

4 jours ago

Vulnérabilités des objets connectés : comment protéger efficacement son réseau en 2025

📡 Objets connectés : des alliés numériques aux risques bien réels Les objets connectés (IoT)…

7 jours ago

Cybersécurité : comment détecter, réagir et se protéger efficacement en 2025

Identifier les signes d'une cyberattaque La vigilance est essentielle pour repérer rapidement une intrusion. Certains…

7 jours ago

This website uses cookies.