Summary: By using energy, Bitcoin is able to issue money in a way that is free and fair for everyone in the world.
It hasn’t been an easy decade for Bitcoin critics.
After arguing at length that Bitcoin was a bubble, a worthless digital trinket destined to fall to zero, observers will notice a recent shift in criticism. Of late, the charge has become that Bitcoin is too successful, and that its success will necessitate an environmental catastrophe.
A former skeptic of Bitcoin myself, I can sympathize with the sentiment. At a time when trust in institutions – be it governments, Wall Street, or Silicon Valley – is low, it’s easy to be critical of claims that Bitcoin’s use of energy is a benefit to society.
Regardless, the unspoken implication is clear: there is a widespread perception that Bitcoin investors are lying about the impact of its energy use for personal gain.
Le règlement DORA : un tournant majeur pour la cybersécurité des institutions financières Le 17…
L’Agence nationale de la sécurité des systèmes d'information (ANSSI) a publié un rapport sur les…
Directive NIS 2 : Comprendre les nouvelles obligations en cybersécurité pour les entreprises européennes La…
Alors que la directive européenne NIS 2 s’apprête à transformer en profondeur la gouvernance de…
L'intelligence artificielle (IA) révolutionne le paysage de la cybersécurité, mais pas toujours dans le bon…
Des chercheurs en cybersécurité ont détecté une intensification des activités du groupe APT36, affilié au…
This website uses cookies.