Blockchain

Why CentralBanks need to go slow on DigitalCurrencies

Please use the sharing tools found via the share button at the top or side of articles. Copying articles to share with others is a breach of FT.com T&Cs and Copyright Policy. Email licensing@ft.com to buy additional rights. Subscribers may share up to 10 or 20 articles per month using the gift article service.

The writer is a senior fellow at Harvard Kennedy School The emergence of central bank digital currencies is inevitable. Research on CBDC design and implementation is under way around the world. China is seven years into the process and has pilot programmes for the e-CNY, or digital yuan. The European Central Bank aims to introduce one by 2025. The Bank of England and Federal Reserve, however, are moving more slowly. And I think they’re right. What’s inevitable isn’t necessarily what’s optimal.  The world’s financial ecosystem has been transformed over the past 15 years. Cryptocurrencies and fintech firms threaten to shift payments, deposits and loans out of the banking sector and into unsupervised networks. This could create a wild west for international finance, threatening sector stability and undermining central banks’ abilities to achieve their mandates. The only defence, CBDC proponents say, is for policymakers to retain ultimate control over financial transactions.

With CBDCs, businesses and individuals could hold accounts directly with the central bank. While that could provide efficiency, it would end the role of banks in financial intermediation. The core of bank business models is leveraging deposits to extend loans and collect a fee. With an unstable deposit base, this practice, and bank profits, will dwindle. Fewer loans would be made, a drag on overall growth. To make up for the lost fees, banks might charge more for payment services and accounts. So much for a cheaper and more inclusive financial system. Politically, it would be very hard for a central bank to step in to fill a lending gap by assuming the role of credit allocator. It would also require a central bank to take on new operational tasks such as credit risk and know your customer (KYC) analysis. More likely, a system would have to be designed so that customers will hold CBDC accounts at a bank or other intermediary, which will provide the services.

Source : https://www.ft.com/content/21e3affe-8c57-4bac-b9c5-21b645e93d7c

Veille-cyber

Share
Published by
Veille-cyber

Recent Posts

Les 7 menaces cyber les plus fréquentes en entreprise

Introduction La cybersécurité est devenue une priorité stratégique pour toutes les entreprises, grandes ou petites.…

2 semaines ago

Cybersécurité : Vers une montée en compétence des établissements de santé grâce aux exercices de crise

Cybersécurité : les établissements de santé renforcent leur défense grâce aux exercices de crise Face…

3 semaines ago

Règlement DORA : implications contractuelles pour les entités financières et les prestataires informatiques

La transformation numérique du secteur financier n'a pas que du bon : elle augmente aussi…

3 semaines ago

L’IA : opportunité ou menace ? Les DSI de la finance s’interrogent

L'IA : opportunité ou menace ? Les DSI de la finance s'interrogent Alors que l'intelligence…

4 semaines ago

Telegram menace de quitter la France : le chiffrement de bout en bout en ligne de mire

Telegram envisage de quitter la France : le chiffrement de bout en bout au cœur…

4 semaines ago

Sécurité des identités : un pilier essentiel pour la conformité au règlement DORA dans le secteur financier

Sécurité des identités : un pilier essentiel pour la conformité au règlement DORA dans le…

4 semaines ago

This website uses cookies.