Digital-only neobanks have more innovative technology than most banks, plus deep funding. That should assure success, but just a handful of neobanks are dominant, with the rest spending a fortune in an attempt to build a sustainable customer base. For banks, this could be an opportunity to acquire struggling neobanks along with their technology prowess.
Digital-only neobanks have seen surging growth and adoption, with a big spike since the pandemic. However, they have used significant amounts of private equity to sustain the growth trajectories they are on.
Given that they still have a long way to go before they start to eat into a significant portion of traditional banks’ customer bases, it’s a fair question as to whether their current cost of acquisition is sustainable.
The neobank pool is getting crowded in any event. In 2017, there were about 100 digital-only neobanks globally, according to Moody’s. Today there are more than 250, though only a small percentage of those (such as Revolut, Rakuten and others) have their own banking license. Most rely on an existing bank’s license under a banking-as-a-service arrangement with partner banks like Cross River, The Bancorp Bank and Lincoln Savings Bank.
Mots-clés : cybersécurité, sécurité informatique, protection des données, menaces cybernétiques, veille cyber, analyse de vulnérabilités, sécurité des réseaux, cyberattaques, conformité RGPD, NIS2, DORA, PCIDSS, DEVSECOPS, eSANTE, intelligence artificielle, IA en cybersécurité, apprentissage automatique, deep learning, algorithmes de sécurité, détection des anomalies, systèmes intelligents, automatisation de la sécurité, IA pour la prévention des cyberattaques.
