One of the questions most frequently asked of the United States Geological Survey is whether earthquakes can be predicted. Their answer is an unconditional “no”. The relevant page on the agency’s website states that no scientist has ever predicted a big quake, nor do they know how such a prediction might be made.
But that may soon cease to be true. Though, after decades of failed attempts and unsubstantiated claims about earthquake prediction, a certain scepticism is warranted—and Paul Johnson, a geophysicist at Los Alamos National Laboratory, is indeed playing down the predictive potential of what he is up to—it is nevertheless the case that, as part of investigations intended to understand the science of earthquakes better, he and his team have developed a tool which might make forecasting earthquakes possible.
L'IA : opportunité ou menace ? Les DSI de la finance s'interrogent Alors que l'intelligence…
Sécurité des identités : un pilier essentiel pour la conformité au règlement DORA dans le…
La transformation numérique du secteur financier n'a pas que du bon : elle augmente aussi…
Telegram envisage de quitter la France : le chiffrement de bout en bout au cœur…
L'intelligence artificielle (IA) révolutionne le paysage de la cybersécurité, mais pas toujours dans le bon…
TISAX® et ISO 27001 sont toutes deux des normes dédiées à la sécurité de l’information. Bien qu’elles aient…
This website uses cookies.