In policy circles, discussions about artificial intelligence invariably pit China against the United States in a race for technological supremacy. If the key resource is data, then China, with its billion-plus citizens and lax protections against state surveillance, seems destined to win. Kai-Fu Lee, a famous computer scientist, has claimed that data is the new oil, and China the new OPEC. If superior technology is what provides the edge, however, then the United States, with its world class university system and talented workforce, still has a chance to come out ahead. For either country, pundits assume that superiority in AI will lead naturally to broader economic and military superiority.

But thinking about AI in terms of a race for dominance misses the more fundamental ways in which AI is transforming global politics. AI will not transform the rivalry between powers so much as it will transform the rivals themselves. The United States is a democracy, whereas China is an authoritarian regime, and machine learning challenges each political system in its own way. The challenges to democracies such as the United States are all too visible. Machine learning may increase polarization—reengineering the online world to promote political division. It will certainly increase disinformation in the future, generating convincing fake speech at scale. The challenges to autocracies are more subtle but possibly more corrosive. Just as machine learning reflects and reinforces the divisions of democracy, it may confound autocracies, creating a false appearance of consensus and concealing underlying societal fissures until it is too late.

Early pioneers of AI, including the political scientist Herbert Simon, realized that AI technology has more in common with markets, bureaucracies, and political institutions than with simple engineering applications. Another pioneer of artificial intelligence, Norbert Wiener, described AI as a “cybernetic” system—one that can respond and adapt to feedback. Neither Simon nor Wiener anticipated how machine learning would dominate AI, but its evolution fits with their way of thinking. Facebook and Google use machine learning as the analytic engine of a self-correcting system, which continually updates its understanding of the data depending on whether its predictions succeed or fail. It is this loop between statistical analysis and feedback from the environment that has made machine learning such a formidable force.

Read more

Veille-cyber

Share
Published by
Veille-cyber

Recent Posts

Les 7 menaces cyber les plus fréquentes en entreprise

Introduction La cybersécurité est devenue une priorité stratégique pour toutes les entreprises, grandes ou petites.…

4 jours ago

Cybersécurité : Vers une montée en compétence des établissements de santé grâce aux exercices de crise

Cybersécurité : les établissements de santé renforcent leur défense grâce aux exercices de crise Face…

2 semaines ago

Règlement DORA : implications contractuelles pour les entités financières et les prestataires informatiques

La transformation numérique du secteur financier n'a pas que du bon : elle augmente aussi…

2 semaines ago

L’IA : opportunité ou menace ? Les DSI de la finance s’interrogent

L'IA : opportunité ou menace ? Les DSI de la finance s'interrogent Alors que l'intelligence…

2 semaines ago

Telegram menace de quitter la France : le chiffrement de bout en bout en ligne de mire

Telegram envisage de quitter la France : le chiffrement de bout en bout au cœur…

2 semaines ago

Sécurité des identités : un pilier essentiel pour la conformité au règlement DORA dans le secteur financier

Sécurité des identités : un pilier essentiel pour la conformité au règlement DORA dans le…

2 semaines ago

This website uses cookies.