Intelligence Artificielle

White House’s AI « Bill of Rights » enters crowded field

The White House issued a call for artificial intelligence systems to be developed with built-in protections Tuesday, even as the tech industry barrels forward in an AI free-for-all.

Why it matters: Automated systems can influence or even determine important aspects of Americans’ lives, including healthcare, employment, housing and education. In the U.S., government regulations covering the new technology remain minimal or nonexistent.

Driving the news: The Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights, released Tuesday by the Office of Science & Technology Policy, describes 5 principles that should be incorporated into AI systems to insure their safety and transparency, limit the impact of algorithmic discrimination, and give users control over data.

The report details real-world consequences of failures to put such principles into practice.

  • A model meant to predict the likelihood of sepsis in hospitalized patients underperformed and caused « alert fatigue » with false warnings.
  • A hiring tool that « learned » employees were predominantly men rejected women applicants, with resumes that had language like « women’s chess club captain » penalized in ranking candidates.

Our thought bubble: The White House is late to this party. Many others have already weighed in with recommendations on AI best practices, including other governments, human rights groups and tech companies.

  • IBM produced a set of principles in 2017, calling for, among other things, AI that can explain itself. « Companies must be able to explain what went into their algorithm’s recommendations. If they can’t, then their systems shouldn’t be on the market, » IBM said at the time.
  • The EU released its list of guidelines back in 2019.
  • Even the Vatican published on the topic, issuing in 2020 what it dubbed a « algor-ethical » framework saying that AI systems need to be designed to protect « the rights and the freedom of individuals so they are not discriminated against by algorithms. »

Flashback: In 2020, the Trump administration outlined 10 regulatory principles for agencies writing rules for the technology, warning against over-regulating the systems.

What they’re saying: In a call with reporters, senior administration officials described the principles as part of President Biden’s commitment to tech accountability.

  • « These technologies are causing real harms in the lives of Americans, » a senior administration official said. « Harms that run counter to our core democratic values, including the fundamental right to privacy, freedom from discrimination and our basic dignity. »

Yes, but: The principles don’t carry the force of law.

  • The White House wants technologists to integrate the safeguards into their products and incorporate them into new designs.
  • Senior administration officials expect enforcement to happen sector by sector, with, for example, Health & Human Services focusing on AI in healthcare or the Department of Housing and Urban Development investigating algorithmic discrimination in housing prices.

The big picture: The tech industry is divided between some companies that say they are seeking to develop AI responsibly and others that believe in advancing the technology as quickly as possible regardless of potential problems.

Veille-cyber

Share
Published by
Veille-cyber

Recent Posts

Les 7 menaces cyber les plus fréquentes en entreprise

Introduction La cybersécurité est devenue une priorité stratégique pour toutes les entreprises, grandes ou petites.…

4 jours ago

Cybersécurité : Vers une montée en compétence des établissements de santé grâce aux exercices de crise

Cybersécurité : les établissements de santé renforcent leur défense grâce aux exercices de crise Face…

2 semaines ago

Règlement DORA : implications contractuelles pour les entités financières et les prestataires informatiques

La transformation numérique du secteur financier n'a pas que du bon : elle augmente aussi…

2 semaines ago

L’IA : opportunité ou menace ? Les DSI de la finance s’interrogent

L'IA : opportunité ou menace ? Les DSI de la finance s'interrogent Alors que l'intelligence…

2 semaines ago

Telegram menace de quitter la France : le chiffrement de bout en bout en ligne de mire

Telegram envisage de quitter la France : le chiffrement de bout en bout au cœur…

2 semaines ago

Sécurité des identités : un pilier essentiel pour la conformité au règlement DORA dans le secteur financier

Sécurité des identités : un pilier essentiel pour la conformité au règlement DORA dans le…

2 semaines ago

This website uses cookies.